Month: January 2025

LGBT, Political, Therapy, Transgender

The Truth About Gender-Affirming Care

S. Reimers, JD/LICSW

Countering the Mischaracterization of Trans Healthcare

A recent study published in JAMA Pediatrics reveals an important yet often overlooked fact about transgender healthcare in the United States: a “very, very small number” of teens receive gender-affirming medical care. This finding underscores the reality that much of the rhetoric surrounding transgender youth is rooted not in evidence but in sensationalism. Despite claims to the contrary, doctors and mental health professionals who follow the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) standards are not “grooming” children. Instead, they are providing thoughtful, evidence-based care that often involves slowing down the decision-making process and exploring various options.

What the Study Tells Us

The study, which analyzed private insurance claims for over 5 million adolescents from 2018 to 2022, found that fewer than 18,000 teens were diagnosed with gender dysphoria during this period. Even more strikingly, fewer than 1,000 accessed puberty blockers, and fewer than 2,000 received hormone therapy. In total, this represents less than 0.1% of teenagers with private insurance.

These numbers stand in stark contrast to the political narrative that frames gender-affirming care as a widespread and reckless phenomenon. Instead, the data reveals that such care is exceedingly rare and highly specialized. Moreover, many transgender youth do not pursue medical interventions at all, opting instead for non-medical changes like adopting a new name or altering their clothing and hairstyle.

A Thoughtful and Cautious Process

The standards of care set forth by WPATH emphasize a thorough, patient-centered approach to gender-affirming care. This process often begins with mental health evaluations and discussions aimed at helping young people explore their gender identity in a safe and supportive environment. Puberty blockers, for instance, are reversible treatments that give adolescents more time to consider their options before making permanent decisions.

Contrary to the inflammatory claims of critics, these interventions are not rushed or taken lightly. Decisions about puberty blockers and hormones are typically made after careful consideration, involving not just the patient but also their family and healthcare team. This aligns with WPATH guidelines, which prioritize the well-being of the individual and recommend age-appropriate care based on robust scientific evidence.

Mischaracterizing Trans Healthcare

Despite the thoughtful nature of gender-affirming care, it has been severely mischaracterized in public discourse. Opponents often portray it as experimental or dangerous, ignoring endorsements from major medical organizations like the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Medical Association. These groups recognize that access to gender-affirming care can significantly improve mental health outcomes for transgender youth, including reducing rates of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation.

The political weaponization of trans healthcare has also led to widespread misinformation. For example, opponents frequently conflate gender-affirming care with irreversible surgeries on minors—a practice that is exceedingly rare and not recommended under WPATH standards for adolescents. Instead, the focus is on non-invasive or reversible treatments designed to provide support during a critical developmental period.

The Disproportionate Focus on Trans Youth

The study’s findings also highlight the disproportionate attention given to transgender youth in political and media discourse. While fewer than 0.1% of teens with private insurance receive gender-related medical care, this small group has become the target of legislative efforts in half of U.S. states. These efforts often ignore the lived experiences of transgender individuals and the consensus of medical professionals in favor of divisive political messaging.

This focus is not only unwarranted but also harmful. Transgender youth already face significant challenges, including higher rates of bullying, discrimination, and mental health struggles. The stigmatization of gender-affirming care exacerbates these issues, creating barriers to accessing supportive and life-affirming treatment.

Slowing Down to Support

Far from “pushing” children into irreversible decisions, providers who adhere to WPATH standards often help young people slow down and consider their options. This approach reflects the core principles of medical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. By creating a space for open dialogue and careful deliberation, healthcare professionals empower patients and their families to make informed decisions based on their unique needs and circumstances.

Moreover, delaying or banning access to gender-affirming care does not eliminate the need for support—it merely shifts the burden onto already vulnerable populations. Denying care increases the risk of negative mental health outcomes, as individuals are forced to navigate their identities without the tools and resources they need to thrive.

The Path Forward

As debates about transgender healthcare continue, it is essential to center evidence and compassion over fear and misinformation. The findings from the JAMA Pediatrics study remind us that gender-affirming care is not a widespread or reckless practice—it is a rare, carefully considered intervention that helps young people navigate their identities with dignity and support.

Rather than demonizing healthcare providers and transgender youth, policymakers and the public should strive to understand the realities of gender-affirming care. This means listening to medical experts, uplifting the voices of transgender individuals, and rejecting the harmful narratives that misrepresent their experiences.

By doing so, we can move toward a more inclusive and compassionate society—one that recognizes the humanity of all its members and ensures that everyone has access to the care they need to live authentically.

If you live in Washington State, and you would like to make an appointment, please feel free to contact me here. I’m looking forward to hearing from you.

:), Susan Reimers, JD/LICSW

Therapy

Understanding Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

S. Reimers, JD/LICSW

Embracing Life’s Challenges with Mindful, Values-Based Commitments

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), pronounced as “act” rather than spelled out, represents a groundbreaking approach in the field of psychotherapy. Rooted in the principles of mindfulness, behavioral science, and acceptance, ACT encourages individuals to embrace life’s challenges rather than resist them. This philosophy aims to foster psychological flexibility, empowering people to live meaningful lives even in the face of adversity.

The Core Philosophy of ACT

ACT is grounded in the belief that psychological suffering arises from the human tendency to avoid or suppress difficult emotions, thoughts, and experiences. At its heart, ACT challenges the conventional goal of eliminating distress, arguing instead that it is our relationship with discomfort—not the discomfort itself—that determines our mental well-being.

The therapy is deeply influenced by Relational Frame Theory (RFT), a modern behavioral science framework that explores how language and cognition influence our behavior. RFT posits that humans are uniquely capable of forming complex associations through language, which, while advantageous, can also lead to cognitive traps such as self-criticism, worry, and avoidance.

ACT emphasizes six interconnected processes that form its therapeutic foundation, often visualized as the points of a hexagon, collectively referred to as the ACT Hexaflex. These processes work in harmony to cultivate psychological flexibility, the ability to stay present, open, and committed to value-driven action even when faced with challenging emotions or thoughts.

The Six Core Processes of ACT

1. Acceptance

Acceptance involves an active and open stance toward difficult thoughts, emotions, and sensations rather than attempting to suppress, control, or avoid them. ACT posits that fighting against unpleasant experiences often amplifies suffering. Instead, acceptance fosters a willingness to coexist with discomfort, recognizing it as a natural part of life.

For instance, rather than avoiding anxiety-provoking situations, an individual learns to acknowledge and make room for the anxiety, allowing them to engage more fully with life.

2. Cognitive Defusion

Cognitive defusion refers to the process of disentangling from unhelpful thoughts and seeing them for what they are—words and images—rather than absolute truths. This practice helps reduce the power and influence of negative thinking.

A common exercise involves imagining a distressing thought as a cloud floating across the sky or writing it on a leaf carried down a stream. These metaphors encourage clients to observe their thoughts from a distance rather than becoming entangled in them.

3. Present Moment Awareness

Mindfulness lies at the heart of ACT, emphasizing non-judgmental awareness of the present moment. This practice encourages individuals to fully experience their surroundings, sensations, and emotions without judgment or distraction.

Present moment awareness helps individuals break free from the grip of past regrets or future anxieties, grounding them in the here and now. Techniques such as mindful breathing, body scans, and sensory awareness exercises are commonly employed to cultivate this skill.

4. Self-as-Context

ACT introduces the concept of “self-as-context,” which differentiates between the “self” as a constant, observing entity and the transient thoughts, feelings, and roles we often associate with our identity. By recognizing that they are more than their thoughts or emotions, individuals can gain perspective and reduce the impact of self-limiting beliefs.

For example, instead of saying, “I am a failure,” an individual might reframe it as, “I notice that I am having the thought that I am a failure.” This subtle shift creates space for self-compassion and empowerment.

5. Values Clarification

ACT emphasizes the importance of identifying and living in alignment with one’s core values. Values are the guiding principles that give life meaning and purpose, such as kindness, creativity, or community involvement. Therapy often involves exercises to help individuals clarify what truly matters to them, serving as a compass for decision-making and goal-setting.

Rather than focusing on symptom reduction, ACT asks, “What do you want your life to stand for?” This shift encourages individuals to focus on what they can control: taking steps toward a fulfilling and values-driven life.

6. Committed Action

Once values are clarified, ACT encourages committed action—taking meaningful steps toward living those values, even in the face of obstacles. This process involves setting realistic goals, developing action plans, and building resilience to persist despite setbacks.

For instance, a person who values connection might commit to reaching out to a friend despite feelings of social anxiety. Over time, these actions build momentum, fostering a sense of agency and purpose.

The Unique Approach of ACT

What sets ACT apart from other therapeutic modalities is its emphasis on acceptance over avoidance and its integration of mindfulness into practical, action-oriented strategies. Unlike Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), which often focuses on challenging and changing unhelpful thoughts, ACT encourages clients to change their relationship with their thoughts. This distinction shifts the focus from controlling internal experiences to engaging meaningfully with external ones.

Another hallmark of ACT is its use of metaphors, experiential exercises, and storytelling to convey complex ideas. For example:

  • The Tug-of-War Metaphor: Imagine you’re in a tug-of-war with a monster (representing your struggles), and there’s a pit in the middle. The harder you pull, the more the monster pulls back. ACT suggests letting go of the rope—not to surrender but to stop exhausting yourself in a battle that keeps you stuck.
  • Passengers on the Bus: In this metaphor, you are the driver of a bus, and your thoughts, emotions, and fears are the passengers. While some passengers may be loud and unpleasant, they don’t control the direction of the bus—you do.

Evidence Base and Applications

ACT has been extensively researched and shown to be effective for a wide range of psychological and physical conditions, including:

  • Anxiety disorders
  • Depression
  • Chronic pain
  • Substance use disorders
  • PTSD
  • Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)

Additionally, ACT is increasingly applied in workplace settings, coaching, and education, demonstrating its versatility and relevance.

Challenges and Critiques

While ACT has gained widespread acceptance, it is not without its critics. Some argue that its concepts can be abstract or difficult to grasp for clients who prefer structured, problem-solving approaches. Additionally, practitioners must strike a balance between acceptance and action, ensuring clients do not become passive in the face of challenges.

Conclusion

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy offers a transformative approach to psychological well-being by teaching individuals to embrace life’s inevitable challenges while staying true to their values. By fostering acceptance, mindfulness, and committed action, ACT helps people navigate their internal experiences with greater flexibility and resilience.

Ultimately, ACT is not about eliminating pain but about creating space for a rich, meaningful life—a life in which discomfort is not a barrier but a companion on the journey toward growth and fulfillment.

If you live in Washington State, and you would like to make an appointment, please feel free to contact me here. I’m looking forward to hearing from you.

:), Susan Reimers, JD/LICSW

Legal, LGBT, Political, Therapy, Transgender

Debunking Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria: Key Findings

S. Reimers, JD/LICSW

Addressing the One Controversial Theory Fueling Anti-Trans Legislation

In the ever-evolving conversation surrounding gender diversity, research provides critical insights to guide compassionate and evidence-based understanding. A 2022 study published in Pediatrics by Jack L. Turban and colleagues challenges the controversial “Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria” (ROGD) hypothesis, which posits that social contagion and peer influence drive sudden transgender identification among adolescents. This study’s findings highlight the resilience of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) youth and underscore the importance of supporting their well-being through gender-affirming care.

Study Overview

The research examined the assigned-at-birth sex ratios and experiences of TGD adolescents using data from school-based surveys conducted across 16 U.S. states in 2017 and 2019. The study’s objectives included evaluating trends in TGD identification, exploring whether social contagion disproportionately affects certain groups, and addressing myths about the motivations behind identifying as TGD. By analyzing responses from a large, diverse sample, the researchers aimed to separate fact from speculation about the lived experiences of TGD youth.

Key Findings

  1. Sex Assigned at Birth Ratios
    The study found that in both 2017 and 2019, there were more assigned-male-at-birth (AMAB) TGD adolescents than assigned-female-at-birth (AFAB) TGD adolescents. This challenges the ROGD hypothesis, which claims that AFAB youth are uniquely susceptible to social contagion driving TGD identification.The slight shift in ratios over time, attributed to fewer AMAB TGD participants rather than an increase in AFAB TGD participants, further debunks claims of an AFAB-specific phenomenon. These findings contradict the idea that peer or social influences are creating clusters of transgender identification among AFAB youth.
  2. Bullying and Mental Health Challenges
    TGD youth were significantly more likely than cisgender peers to experience bullying and mental health struggles, including suicide attempts. The rates of bullying were higher for TGD youth than even for cisgender sexual minority youth. These patterns highlight the vulnerability of TGD adolescents to external stigma and the critical need for supportive environments.The data also counters the assertion that identifying as TGD offers a social advantage or serves as a way to escape sexual minority stigma. Instead, many TGD youth also identified as gay, lesbian, or bisexual, underscoring that their experiences with stigma are compounded rather than reduced.
  3. A Decrease in TGD Identification Over Time
    The percentage of adolescents identifying as TGD decreased from 2.4% in 2017 to 1.6% in 2019. This decline contradicts the notion of a social contagion effect driving exponential increases in TGD identification. If social contagion were at play, one would expect a steady or growing trend rather than a decrease.
  4. Debunking the ROGD Hypothesis
    The study directly refutes claims central to the ROGD hypothesis: that social influences uniquely drive AFAB youth toward TGD identification and that these identifications result from peer pressure or efforts to gain social status. By leveraging robust, population-based data, the researchers demonstrated that these narratives lack empirical support.

The Importance of Gender-Affirming Care

One of the most critical implications of this study is its support for gender-affirming medical care. Myths such as ROGD have been weaponized in legislative debates to deny TGD adolescents access to care, despite overwhelming evidence from major medical organizations that such care improves mental health outcomes. The researchers emphasize that restricting access to gender-affirming care based on unfounded hypotheses is not only scientifically unsound but also harmful to the well-being of TGD youth.

A n Affirming Perspective

This study reinforces that TGD youth deserve acceptance, support, and access to life-affirming care. The persistence of stigma and misinformation, such as the ROGD hypothesis, underscores the importance of amplifying evidence-based narratives that respect the lived experiences of transgender individuals. Rather than questioning the validity of TGD identities, society should focus on addressing the systemic factors—like bullying and discrimination—that harm these adolescents.

Ultimately, this research affirms that TGD youth are not merely responding to fleeting social trends or peer influences. They are navigating complex identities in a world that often misunderstands them. By creating a society grounded in empathy, evidence, and inclusion, we can empower these young people to thrive authentically.

If you live in Washington State, and you would like to make an appointment, please feel free to contact me here. I’m looking forward to hearing from you.

:), Susan Reimers, JD/LICSW